
Learn the Excision of a sural nerve end neuroma and application of a Polyganics NeuroCapTM surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Excision of a sural nerve end neuroma and application of a Polyganics NeuroCapTM surgical procedure.
The sural nerve is a common donor site for autologous nerve grafting for peripheral nerve defects. It is harvested from the lower leg from the midpoint of the upper calf to the lateral ankle mid way between the posterior aspect of the lateral malleolus and the Achilles tendon. When harvested the proximal end is usually cleanly transected and left deep to the deep fascia to reduce the risk of a symptomatic end neuroma formation.
In this case the patient had trauma to the right forearm following a road traffic collision and the sural nerve harvest was for reconstruction of the posterior interosseus nerve as three reversed cable grafts for extensor carpi ulnaris, finger extension and thumb extension. Three years later he represented with pain in the posterior calf worse when lying supine in bed with sleep disturbance. A diagnostic local anaesthetic block under ultrasound confirmed excellent pain reduction and he was consented for exploration and neroma resection and application of a Polyganics bioresorbable PCL NeuroCapTM.

INDICATIONS
The indications for exploration of a neuroma are neuropathic pain with neurostenalgia (tether pain) following trauma to a peripheral nerve. This should not be responsive to conservative management with analgesia, neuromodulator medication, desensitisation exercises and other strategies including mirror therapy. There should also be a good response to targeted peripheral nerve local anaesthetic blockade with a pain reduction of at least 50% on a visual analogue scale. The decision to use a NeuroCap should be for the management of an end neuroma following nerve transection or amputation. The NeuroCap can also be used for the management of a neuroma in continuity in sensory nerves where there is no distal sensory preservation and there is a contraindication to reconstruction such as a poor surgical bed that is unlikely to provide a favourable environment to support regeneration through a nerve graft.
In this case there was a history of chronic neuropathic pain at the site of sural nerve harvest for autologous reconstruction of a nerve gap in the upper limb.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
The patient reported pain in the posterior calf on lying supine. There was a palpable 1cm firm spherical swelling at the site of reported pain at the upper end of the previous surgical scar. There was a positive Tinel’s sign (pain and dysaesthesiae in the distribution of the sural nerve) on gently tapping over the swelling. There was hypoaesthesia in the distal cutaneous territory of the sural nerve.
IMAGING
Ultrasound is a useful investigation to define the site of a neuroma where the clinical examination is equivocal. Some patients do not tolerate the pressure required from the ultrasound probe for this investigation due to allodynia. In this case the previous surgery, palpable swelling and positive Tinel’s sign precluded the need for further imaging.A diagnostic nerve block with local anaesthetic and a visual analogue pain score (VAS 0-100mm) are useful to confirm a positive pain reduction response prior to consideration of surgical excision.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
There is no single satisfactory solution for the definitive management of a painful neuroma. In a neuroma in continuity for a critical nerve, sensory restoration through excision of the neuroma and nerve grafting may reduce neuroma pain. Restoration of pain to anaesthetic skin may modulate pain pathways centrally. Using a processed nerve allograft for this reconstruction may confer advantages over autologous nerve grafting as the latter creates another sensory nerve injury (albeit a controlled surgical insult) to a nerve in a pre-sensitised individual.
In many situations there is an end neuroma or the surgical bed is too poor to sustain revascularisation and nerve regeneration through a nerve graft. Many operations have been described for end neuromata including simple transection of the nerve and removal of the neuroma. Regrowth and tether of the cut nerve end in scar is very common and therefore repositioning the proximal end to deeper tissues including bone and muscle is often recommended. The aim of this intervention is to provide more padding around the nerve end to prevent mechanical irritation and the healthier tissues should be better vascularised and prevent nerve tether to mobile cutaneous tissue. Allograft can be used to redirect regenerating nerve proximally or directly in to muscles in situations where the anatomy precludes direct deeper relocation of the nerve end following end neuroma resection. Polyganics have developed a bioresorbable polycaprolactone nerve capping device (the NeuroCap) that is designed to cover the nerve end following neuroma resection. The device has a chamber for nerve regrowth but the nerve is prevented from adherence to scar by a physical barrier which slowly changes to a hydrogel and is ultimately completely resorbed over 18 months.
The NeuroCap was the treatment of choice for this neuroma in the sural nerve at the site of previous autologous nerve harvest.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
The management of neuroma pain is challenging. Patients frequently are prescribed increasing doses of systemic opioid medication with poor symptom relief. Neuromodulators including Pregabalin and Gabapentin may modulate the pain response through their effects on central pathways. The use of antidepressant medications can also help to modulate central pain perception and improve affect in patients with chronic neuropathic pain. Topical analgesics including local anaesthetic patches may help areas of cutaneous hyperaesthesia and local anaesthetic gels or creams may have the added benefit of facilitating local scar management to reduce nerve tether and desensitise nerve endings in the skin. Capsaicin patches are useful in areas of cutaneous hypersensitivity.
Physical therapies including friction massage, desensitisation and neural glides are useful in the early stages of management of nerve pain at the site of a suspected neuroma.
Nerve stimulation can modify the pain response and is the basis of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) therapy.
Spinal cord stimulation is an option for severe neuropathic pain management when other more conservative methods have failed and where there is no surgical target for the management of the neuropathic pain.
Mirror therapy involves the use of masking of the affected limb and functional movement, tactile stimulation and massage of the contralateral normal limb with graduated introduction of tactile stimulation bilaterally to facilitate visual over riding of the pathological central nervous system pain pathways. This has demonstrated benefit in the management of phantom limb pain after amputation and in the rehabilitation after peripheral nerve injury and stroke.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
The NeuroCap is contraindicated in active infection, poor surgical beds or hypersensitivity to polycaprolactone. The NeuroCap is limited to 8mm diameter nerve stumps and the stump should be measured so that an appropriate sized device can be used for each nerve. The nerve stump should have sufficient length that it can be mobilised and introduced to the cap with a 5mm distal void to allow for unsupported nerve regeneration. The device must be anchored loosely to a deep tissue plane to prevent superficial migration and the risk of wound irritation or extrusion. The soft tissue cover should adequate to pad the area as the NeuroCap may be palpable for a few months. Caution should be exerted in the surgical management of neuromata where there is only a poor response to pre-operative local anaesthetic nerve blockade. In such cases the pain may have significant central modulation that will result in a poor response to surgical intervention in the periphery.

The patient was consented for exploration under general anaesthesia and the neuroma site and limb are identified with a permanent skin marker.
Antibiotics were administered after induction to cover insertion of the prosthetic NeuroCap device.
He was positioned in the lateral position with shaving of the skin at the site of surgery on the posterior calf. A tourniquet was applied with padding to the mid thigh.
The skin was prepared with an alcoholic disinfectant and draped above the knee using a limb pack, leaving the whole lower leg, foot and ankle exposed.
Exsanguination was achieved with elevation and application of an Esmark bandage and the tourniquet was inflated.
Basic instruments are required with a Mixter forceps, surgical rubber sloops and a self-retaining Travers retractor.
Microinstruments and an operating microscope are required for neuroma resection and application of the NeuroCap.

Surgery is performed as a day case unless there is debilitating neuropathic pain and concerns regarding management of post-operative pain. In such cases I would advise admitting the patient and leaving an indwelling nerve catheter adjacent to the proximal sural nerve so that a background local anaesthetic infusion and intermittent boluses can be delivered for 1-2 days post-operatively.
The patient is advised to elevate the limb for 48 hours after surgery.
I usually recommend continuation of usual pain medications and neuromodulators for at least 6 weeks following surgery before controlled reduction. This strategy reduces the risk of a pain flare response form surgery and nerve manipulation in sensitised individuals.
Dressing reduction can be undertaken at 5-7 days and the wound can be left open from 2 weeks with advise on scar massage from 3 weeks.
The patient can full weight bear mobilise after surgery.

NeuroCap results
The patient should have a visual analogue score monitored pre-operatively, after the diagnostic block and at intervals of 3,6,12 and 24 months post-operatively. The outcome of neuroma surgery is variable. Careful pre-operative patient assessment and selection is key to good results.
References:
Van Der Avoort DJJC, Hovius SER, Selles RW, Van Neck JW, Coert JH. The incidence of symptomatic neuroma in amputation and neurorrhaphy patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2013;66(10):1330-1334
Stokvis A, van der Avoort D-JJC, van Neck JW, Hovius SER, Coert JH. Surgical management of neuroma pain: a prospective follow-up study. Pain. 2010;151(3):862-869
Lewin-Kowalik J, Marcol W, Kotulska K, Mandera M, Klimczak A. Prevention and management of painful neuroma. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2006;46(2):62-67; discussion 67-68
Watson J, Gonzalez M, Romero A, Kerns J. Neuromas of the hand and upper extremity. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(3):499-510
Elliot D, Sierakowski A. The surgical management of painful nerves of the upper limb: a unit perspective. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2011;36(9):760-770
Reference
- orthoracle.com
























































