
Learn the Minimally invasive distal tibial osteotomy and correction of deformity with the Taylor Spatial Frame surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Minimally invasive distal tibial osteotomy and correction of deformity with the Taylor Spatial Frame surgical procedure.
The adoption of technology and innovative techniques in orthopaedic surgery reflects an evolution seen in surgery more generally. The driver of surgical innovation is a quest to decrease complication rates and improve patients outcomes whilst secondarily improving the cost-effectiveness of interventions. One clear example of a true “sea-change” in Orthopaedic treatment has been the development of distraction osteogenesis with the Ilizarov frame and its’ successor the Taylor spatial frame.
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of the foot and ankle was popularised with arthroscopic techniques for joint related pathology but has now progressed to other techniques, traditionally performed in an open fashion, such as osteotomies to correct deformity.
The Taylor Spatial frame is a hexapod system that was devised initially for the treatment of complex fractures and limb lengthening and is based on the philosophy of distraction osteogenesis and a novel stabilisation technique for fractures. This was conceived and popularised by the Russian Gavriil Abramovich Ilizarov, practicing in the Kurgan region of Russia, who treated limb length discrepancy and non unions of tibial fractures with his frame and gained world attention in the 50s and 60s. The management of difficult fracture non-unions, especially of the tibia, was transformed with the use of his frame and also distraction osteogenesis.
Ilizarov found that by distracting immature callus he could initiate, and even accelerate, bone growth whilst keeping the patient ambulant and weight bearing. The use of struts in a hexapod formation to effect changes in the position of a point through 3 dimensional space is not new in its philosophy. It was first described as a mathematical principle by Chasles, a 19th century mathematician who was the father of conic theory. Chasles demonstrated mathematically that it was possible to move an object in all 3 dimensions spatially by the use of 6 types of transitions simultaneously. This theory was successfully incorporated into simulators in various industries, such as aviation. Ilizarovs’ frame was a functioning model of the same mathematical principle and was able to distract rotate angulate and translate bone in all dimensions. His frame required real motors and hinges where the adjustments had to be made manually with complex mathematical calculations that were required to correct deformity in particular.
Charlie Taylor with his team then produced the same frame with adjustable telescoping struts called the Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) and used computing power to calculate how the lengthening and shortening of these struts could influence deformity correction in the same manner as Ilizarov’s frame. Their frame did not need hinges as these were now rendered virtual by the strut arrangement. A computer provided the prescription by which these were to be shortened or lengthened to correct the deformity of long bones and joints. In the latter case the selective stretching of contracted tissue around the joint was made easier and far less traumatic than open release by doing it gradually so that nerve and artery were not stretched to the point of failure. It is also used in infections of bone as distraction also distorts and makes hostile the milieu in which pathogens flourished, possibly by mechanically distorting their environments.
Minimally invasive surgery has been attempted sporadically for many decades but now has gained popularity by the advent of predictable and safe cutting instrumentation. The use of burrs rather than saws to make bone cuts meant that rotary cutting power could be used rather than oscillation. As a result the entry portal for the cutting instrument could be reduced to a few millimetres as cutting with rotation means only a small arc of travel of the instrument is required. The use of high torque and low speed burrs also meant that bone could now be osteotomized effectively without significant increases in temperature, therefore preventing the complication of thermal bionecrosis seen with the high speed cutting of bone by power saws. The use of irrigated instruments further decreases this complication. Such minimally invasive methods are particularly useful in difficult biological situations such as poor skin quality, multiple and severe scarring as also extensive skin grafted areas, patients with dubious peripheral circulation, diabetics and other patients who have an increased risk of infection.
The patient is a female in her early 40s and suffered a distal tibial fracture which was treated several years ago with internal fixation. She suffered an infection and subsequently required to have the broken metalwork removed from the tibia. The fibula was stabilised with an osteotomy to try and correct the deformity whilst there was still a tibial nonunion present. However this did not correct the tibial deformity which persisted. She went on to heal after about a year, but suffered a significant malunion of her distal tibia in varus and recurvatum. She was also a heavy smoker and this precluded her surgeons from attempting to correct her deformity by open methods and conventional internal fixation and therefore she persevered with her deformity. However she started to suffer significant ankle pain and the emergence of symptomatic ankle arthritis. The likelihood of fusion was increasing but given the severity of her deformity it was difficult to consider an ankle arthrodoesis without shortening and acute correction of deformity through the fusion . This made the procedure technically demanding and the outcome unpredictable in its biomechanical sequlae. My decision was therefore to use MIS techniques for osteotomy and the Taylor spatial frame for deformity correction prior to any fusion.
The patient was counselled on the need to stop smoking and avoid the use of all nicotine products to give the operation the best chance of success. She was also advised about the significant risks involved in the procedure and was given the opportunity to discuss the procedure with other patients who had had TSF correction of deformity. This is a very important process as the TSF once applied cannot be removed before the completion of treatment which can take up to 6 months or longer in some cases. This can have a very significant psychological impact on patients. It is therefore essential to identify patients who are not psychologically suitable for the TSF. The wrong choice of patients can have a devastating outcome for both patient and surgeon especially if treatment has to be aborted prematurely.
Minimally invasive surgery and external fixation has become the primary method of treatment for osteotomy and deformity correction in my practice. I use limited open techniques only when necessary. The safety and biological advantages of the minimally invasive osteotomy, the flexibility, reliability and robustness of the TSF along with its ease of correction of multiaxial deformity through computer aided prescription has certainly aided this process.
Readers will also find of interest the open technique of performing a distal tibial osteotomy detailed on OrthOracle at Supra malleolar osteotomy.

INDICATIONS
The use of a frame allied with a minimally invasive surgical technique can be used for correction of most deformities in the tiba and hindfoot but is particularly useful for the correction of ankle deformity. It is invaluable in situations where large soft tissue exposures are likely to lead to wound breakdown or where bone quality will be predictably poor and give an issue with traditional fixation techniques.
These sort of situations occur commonly with diabetes, bone and soft tissue infection, severe post traumatic deformity correction, correction of deformity in patients with severely scarred and compromised soft tissues, those with existing plastic surgical reconstructions such as free flaps and patients with severe soft tissue contractures.
Severe pain on weight bearing due to arthritis in a misaligned joint, restriction of walking due to pain, inability to engage in activities of daily living, and night pain are some of the indication for deformity correction and possible eventual fusion or ankle replacement in the right patient.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
Patients with angular and rotational deformity present with pain in the affected misaligned joint rather than the bone deformity that caused the problem in the first place. With symptomatic ankle arthritis the presenting complaints are pain on movement and weight bearing, stiffness and sometimes swelling and functional instability due to pain. As the arthritis becomes more severe night pain can also be an issue. Limb length discrepancy which arises as a secondary effect of malunion can be particularly crippling if severe with back, sacroiliac and hip pain being the result of a tilted pelvis.
Clinical examination should be holistic and assess the physical and mental state of the patient. A careful history taking in this patient was what elicited the presence of infection at the operation site as old documentation was not available on the patient and the information was not volunteered by her. examination of the deformity it self should be complemented with assessments of sacrs, and skin tethering as this patient had extensive scarring and tethering of skin to the deformity. This is particularly relevant when deciding on MIS.
The neurovascular status should be accurately established and documented.
IMAGING
Routine radiographs weight bearing of the entire limb is necessary to accurately map the deformity.
A CT Scanogram is necessary to assess limb length discrepancy particularly if the patient has had more than one long bone fracture on the same side . This will help to decide the amount of lengthening that may be required during the process of distraction
An MRI may be necessary to assess the severity of the arthritis and also may throw light on the actual malunion and whether there are any telltale signs of infection.
If in doubt then an labelled white cell scan must be performed to ensure that there is no residual infection at the proposed site of osteotomy.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
Conventional deformity correction surgery would require the excision of a lateral and posterior based wedge to correct deformity and shorten the bone to acutely correct the deformity and then to stabilise with a plate or intramedullary nail
Fusion of the ankle can be done adjusting for the deformity to create a plantigrade foot on weight bearing
The deformity can also be corrected using the Computer Hexapod Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery (CHAOS) using osteotomy and TSF to intraoperatively correct deformity and subsequent internal fixation of the corrected deformity
Rarely, and particularly in patients with severe open infections along with malunion or patients with severe neurological/ vascular compromise or indeed those with intractable pain due to neurological injury may require an amputation above the deformity so that they can return to ambulation with a prosthesis.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
Orthotic management may be of use in correctable deformities, though can lead to high contact pressures at the interface of orthotic and limb.
There is some role for providing a stable and plantar-grade surface to weight bear on by using an AFO, posted appropriately under the deformity, for patients unsuitable for surgery.
Analgesia to control pain can provide some respite
Injection into the arthritic joint can provided temporarily relief
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Frank Sepsis or acute osteomyelitis is an absolute contraindication for osteotomy
Psychologically unsuitable or non compliant patients are an absolute contraindication for long term frame management.
Decreased peripheral circulation should be treated with revascularization procedures and is a relative contraindication

An elaborate consenting process is absolutely essential and informed consent should be obtained and available in the OR to cross check and confirm the nature of the operation. The operation side should be marked and cross checked during the WHO Check list meeting.
The following apparatus should be available in theatre:
The TSF kit (Smith & Nephew) which is elaborate and consists of rings, struts Rancho cubes, threaded rods connectors, pin and wire clamps, nuts, bolts, washers, bolt and wire cutters, spanners, shoulder nuts for the struts, a walker to connect at the end of the operation to allow the patient to weight bear, and other connecting apparatus.
The MIS kit (Wright Medical)consists of a a 2mm/ 12 mm shannon burr(for the fibula if MIS is considered for the fibular osteotomy) 3mm/30 mm Shannon burr (for the tibial osteotomy)with the hand piece, the motor apparatus to run the handpiece as also provide the irrigation, a set of instruments which include the Beaver blade, disposable straight and curved periosteal elevators, and rasps which are not need for this procedure.
The operation is done under spinal or general anaesthesia. As the procedure may take over 2 hours the anaesthetist must be warned if a spinal is used. if MIS is used for all the components of the operation then a tourniquet is not necessary for the operation but I would normally apply the cuff on ready to inflate if troublesome bleeding occurs or there is the need to convert to an open procedure for whatever reason. In this particular operation i have used the tourniquet for the initial part of the operation to remove the fibular metalwork and subsequently the tourniquet was deflated.
The patient is placed supine , prepped above the knee to be draped such that the tibial tuberosity and patella are available as reference points to assess the axis of the limb. A sand bag is placed underneath the ipsilateral buttock such that the toes are pointing upwards and the inevitable external rotation of the lower limb in the supine position is corrected

The patient is encouraged walk as soon as possible and even on the day of surgery as weight bearing encourages callus formation. Antibiotics are given for 3 days postoperatively in my practice along with adequate analgesia.
The dressings are left for a week after which they are changed at the wound clinic. Deformity correction is started a week after surgery to ensure that the haematoma at the osteotomy site starts to organise into early osteogenic material which can then be distracted and deformed to correct deformity. The patient is reviewed every 2 weeks for the first 6 weeks to obtain x rays to ensure that the correction is progressing satisfactorily and also to ensure that the struts rings pin and wire sleeves are checked for tightness. Pinsite discipline is extremely important in preventing pinsite infection and should be emphasised and reiterated to patients throughout their treatment until the frame is removed. An xray at 6 weeks is performed to determine if it was adequately healing and whether the foot ring could be removed at this stage. In this patient the foot ring was left on until 8 weeks. The frame is then locked off and patient allowed to walk on it with physiotherapy to mobilise the ankle satisfactorily. An pinsite infection is treated aggressively with lavage washing and scrubbing of the portals to keep them crust free.. The frame is then removed when it is deemed that the osteotomy has fully healed . This will require another anaesthetic. The patient is then mobilised for a week or 2 in a plaster then in a boot gradually weaning off it with the physio therapy.
If at 6 weeks there is no significant callus formation then a new prescription is created for distraction of the osteotomy site to provoke callus formation. Sometimes the so called Concertina maneuver of distraction and compression is utilised to help generate callus formation. Occasionally it may need further adjuvant procedures such a re-osteotomy of the fibula , dynamization of alternate struts etc to help with healing . This is particularly the case in smokers and others with risk factors for non union.

The long term results of correction of deformity using MIS technique has not been reported much in literature. The results of hindfoot osteotomy by MIS techniques however is reported on in the literature and has very good and predictable outcomes of function and healing. The use of the TSF in deformity is well established in the orthopaedic armamentarium and indeed is preferred by many to be the most efficient safe and reliable method of deformity correction in peripheral long bone deformity. I have found it particularly useful in correcting complex deformity in the tibia foot and ankle. It comes of its own in the treatment of Charcot deformity of the mid and hindfoot and have used it also to correct deformity by fusions of hindfoot and ankle joints. This is particularly useful in areas of poor skin and soft tissue states , patients with past infections and others with sterile ulcers where I am reluctant to use internal fixation.
S. Robert Rozbruch, Kira Segal, Svetlana Ilizarov, Austin T. Fragomen,Gabriel Ilizarov Does the TSF accurately correct tibial deformity? CORR May 2010, Volume 468, Issue 5 pp 1352–1361 . This is a paper that discusses the results of percutaneous osteotomy and TSF correction of tibial deformity in 102 patients and found correction to be accurate at all levels of the tibia
Hans Michael Manner, Michael Huebl, Christof Radler, Rudolf Ganger, Gert Petje, Franz Grill.Accuracy of complex lower-limb deformity correction with external fixation: a comparison of the Taylor Spatial Frame with the Ilizarov ring fixator. Journal of Children’s Orthopaedics Vol. 1, No. 1. Published Online:1 Mar 2007. This paper confirms the suggestion that the TSF with its computer prescribed deformity correction facility has a much more accurate outcome than the Ilizarov frame with good outcomes in 280 paediatric patients.
Reference
- orthoracle.com



















































































