
Learn the Sural nerve graft reconstruction of the sciatic nerve after resection of a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Sural nerve graft reconstruction of the sciatic nerve after resection of a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour surgical procedure.
Autologous reversed sural nerve cable grafting is the gold standard method for reconstruction of large nerve gaps in mixed (motor and sensory) major nerve trunks. Functional recovery is determined by the gap length, the site of the reconstruction, the duration of denervation, the surgical graft bed, the quality of the target muscles and the age of the patient. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNST) are rare and usually present with a rapidly enlarging and painful mass with associated sensory and motor deficits. There may be a history of a neurofibromatosis which is associated with malignant transformation in peripheral nerve sheath tumours. Magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy are used to determine the diagnosis. The pathophysiological grade and the stage of disease determine the prognosis. Staging computed tomography will identify whether there are any metastases at presentation.
The surgical management involves excision of the tumour with a cuff of normal tissue to achieve an adequate surgical margin. Whilst the exact width of an adequate margin remains a sourc of constant debate, it should take into consideration the histological subtype, the quality of the margin tissue, the proximity of nearby vital structures and the use of adjuvant or neo adjuvant radiotherapy. In the case of large tumours and high grade histologies, compartment excision or ablative surgery may need to be considered to achieve an adequate margin. When post-operative radiation is required, non-vascularised autologous graft reconstruction is unlikely to support useful neural regeneration. In lower grade tumours, gap reconstruction with autologous graft provides a scaffold for nerve regeneration and results in less neuropathic pain, some proximal motor recovery and the chance of protective sensation to the plantar surface of the foot. Biopsy may lead to sampling error and the final grading of the tumour and adequacy of excision can only be determined on final specimen histopathological examination.
The case presented is a Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours that was biopsied and reported as low grade and surgical excise and bilateral autologous rural nerve cable grafting performed for gap reconstruction. The technique presented here will focus on the grafting technique and alternative options.
The tumour resection and discussion of the decision-making process for tumour management is covered in brief here but is covered in more detail with a technical description on OrthOracle at:
Excision of soft tissue Sarcoma ( thigh)

INDICATIONS
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNST) are rare and typically present as painful enlarging masses in peripheral nerves. They may be sporadic or associated with neurofibromatosis. There is frequently a neurological deficit depending on the nerve of origin and the site of tumour involvement. Surgical resection is the primary treatment and the resultant nerve gap may be reconstructed with autologous nerve graft for the management of nerve pain and potentially to restore some motor or sensory function to the affected limb.
A biopsy is performed to identify the tumour type and grade. Staging considers the tumour size, grade and whether metastases are present on imaging.
Grading
Low-grade means the cancer cells are slow-growing, look quite similar to normal cells, are less aggressive, and are less likely to spread
Intermediate-grade means the cancer cells are growing slightly faster and look more abnormal
High-grade means the cancer cells are fast growing, look very abnormal, are more aggressive and are more likely to spread
Staging
Staging is defined as local or systemic and defines the degree of tumour involvement on the whole patient. Local staging is dependant on cross sectional imaging of the tumour and histological assessment of biopsy material. Systemic staging is defined as identification of metastatic disease. Staging takes into consideration the size, depth and histological activity of the tumour, and the presence of metastatic disease. Tumours are classified histologically as low grade, intermediate grade or high grade depending on the degree of differentiation, mitotic activity and nuclear size. Soft tissue sarcomas are classified as superficial or deep depending on their relationship to the deep fascia. Common sites of metastatic disease include the lungs though certain histological variants can metastasise to other areas including other soft tissues, bone and liver.
Surgery to resect the tumour results in neurologic deficit which is usually permanent. In all cases, the aim of surgery is to achieve local control of the tumour by its complete removal with an adequate margin. This has been shown to reduce the risk of local recurrence though the effect of local recurrence on overall survival is less clear. Where complete removal of the tumour can be achieved with limb salvage surgery, the effect on function of the limb should also be taken into consideration when planning surgical excision.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
There is usually a large mass in the line of a peripheral nerve with distal motor sensory and /or motor dysfunction. There is usually neuropathic pain and there may be a Tinel’s sign elicited when tapping over the tumour. The pain or paraesthesia that is indicative of a positive Tinel’s sign is felt in the cutaneous territory supplied by the affected nerve.
IMAGING
Magnetic resonance imaging is the preferred method of cross sectional imaging. This allows accurate initial characterisation of the tumour and allows local staging. MR allows planning for final surgical resection highlighting the tumour proximity to vital structures as well as accurately detailing the structures involved and affected by the tumour.
Computed tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen and pelvis is used for tumour staging to identify any metastases at presentation. In certain histological variants (eg myxoid liposarcoma) which can metastasise to atypical locations, whole body imaging in the form of whole body MRI or PET-CT may be used.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
The standard method of treatment involves a biopsy to define the grade of the tumour and combined with the imaging findings may be used to decide on whether pre-operative radiotherapy is required. Surgical options depend on the site, size, grade, functional deficit and potential morbidity of surgery. Surgery can involve simple tumour resection, compartment excision or amputation. The decision to reconstruct the nerve gap is a complex one and a peripheral nerve specialist should be involved in the discussion with the patient and the multidisciplinary oncology team. Gap reconstruction with non-vascularised autologous graft is the gold standard in gaps up to 70mm. Longer gaps are controversial as there is little evidence that useful motor or sensory recovery returns. The option for autologous graft should be carefully considered when post-operative radiotherapy is planned. Staged reconstruction could be considered, however there is the added challenge of surgery in a scarred bed with poor vascularity. The sural nerve has a significant connective tissue component and only approximately 30% of the cross-sectional area is comprised of endoneural tubes. Due to the length available and the relatively minor morbidity with sensory loss around the lateral border of the heel and foot, it is the preferred site for autologous grafting when large lengths are required. There are other sites that may be preferred for small gaps and in the upper limb operating on a single limb under regional anaesthesia may be preferable and so a cutaneous medial or lateral arm or forearm nerve may be selected. The risk of donor site neuroma at the proximal stump is low and the published evidence supports 2-5% as being a typical rate. An alternative is to consider using processed nerve allograft which avoids the donor site cost to the patient. It is a useful strategy when the gap reconstruction is aimed at reducing neuropathic pain and functional recovery is considered unlikely. For essential motor nerves, the option of a distal motor nerve transfer for a critical function or a sensory transfer for protective sensation should bee considered, however they are often not available. In this case of sciatic nerve resection there are no remaining motor nerve transfer options for function below knee.
Autologous nerve transfer was planned due to pre-existing neuropathic pain and biopsy demonstrating low grade MPNST and so no adjunctive radiotherapy was planned, assuming surgical resection margins are adequate.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
Multi modal treatment for soft tissue sarcomas remains the mainstay of treatment combining surgical resection with adjuvant or neo adjuvant radiation therapy. Contraindications to surgery are largely limited to patients in whom surgical excision would carry a significant risk of peri operative mortality, or those in whom resection of the primary tumour will not result in cure eg patients with advanced metastatic disease. For patients in whom the risks of surgery or the functional detriment outweigh the potential of gaining local control (eg patients with small volume metastatic disease where tumour excision will result in significant functional detriment), isolated limb perfusion may be considered. ILP relies on isolation of the limb vascular circulate and infiltration of chemotherapy agents at high doses int the affected limb. This has been shown to produce high rates of local tumour control without the functional detriment of surgical excision or ablative limb surgery.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
A relative contraindication to nerve gap reconstruction with autologous nerve graft after MPNST resection is planned post-operative radiotherapy or extensive compartment excision where no useful functional recovery is likely. Long gaps are also unlikely to provide useful functional recovery. In such cases surgical reconstruction with grafts is primarily offered to reduce post-operative neuropathic pain.

The patient is counselled regarding the diagnosis, the risks of surgery and the morbidity of nerve resection balanced against the increased survival. The MRI is used to plan the tumour resection margins and estimate the resultant nerve gap for reconstruction. In this case the gap was estimated at 150mm and therefore both sural nerves would be needed to provide sufficient cables for bridging the nerve gap.Under a general anaesthetic the patient is placed prone on the operating table under general anaesthesia. A tourniquet is placed on the contralateral thigh to reduce blood loss during sural nerve harvest from the normal leg. ~No tourniquet was used on the side of the tumour due to the site of tumour in the mid to lower thigh.
The surgical resection was performed by a team of specialist orthopaedic oncology and peripheral nerve reconstruction surgeons. The oncological procedure and decision making will be covered separately in the oncology atlas of OrthoOracle.
Two sets of surgical instruments are required with a change or instruments gowns and gloves after tumour resection and application of orientation sutures. This is to prevent tumour contamination to other surgical sites. The nerve reconstruction requires loupe magnification, a mister and surgical rubber loops for donor nerve graft mobilisation and dissection, micro instruments, fine 8’0 and 9’0 sutures and Tisseel tissue glue. The autologous nerve grafts are inserted with microscope magnification.

The operated limb is protected in an extension knee brace too prevent excessive movement at the graft site. The foot of the bed is elevated to reduce swelling and observations to ensure no bleeding.
The drains are left in for 72 hours or longer if continuing to drain more than 50mls per day. The dressings can be reduced at 10-14 days and clip and steristrips removed at 2 weeks.
The patient can mobilise full weight bearing with crutches for support and using the extension knee brace for three weeks.
Th patient should be monitored for neuropathic pain and consideration given to prescribing neuromodulatory therapy (Pregabalin, Gabapentin or Amitriptyline) which needs to be continued until neural recovery is established.
The histopathology specimen will be examined and reported to ensure that resection margins are adequate and to confirm that the biopsy low grade atypia is correct. Sampling error can lead to an under estimate of grade and the final prognosis and subsequent need for adjuvant therapies rests on the histological analysis of the resected specimen.
The approach to the tumour will be covered separately in the orthopaedic oncology atlas for OrthOracle. Here a brief summary of the oncology approach is added for completeness, although the focus is on the nerve graft reconstruction.
Recovery in a nerve gap of this size is unpredictable. The immediate reconstruction in a relatively healthy bed with a controlled surgical trauma to the nerve may allow successful neural regeneration and outgrowth from the proximal nerve stump. However the distance for the axons to cross is challenging and sustained growth requires Schwann cells to survive within the graft or migration of Schwann cells to support the growing axons plus adequate revascularisation.
Surgery is done in this case primarily to prevent an symptomatic end neuroma at the proximal stump, to reduce the risk of severe neuropathic pain and to hopefully gain some motor activity in the proximally innervated muscles in the lower leg. Distal motor reinnervation is unlikely duet the time-distance phenomenon. Nerve regeneration is approximately 1-1.5mm per day in acute reconstructions (although closer to 1 in the lower limb and when there are large gaps distant to the nerve cell body). Motor reinnervation has to be within 12 months if it is to be successful and typically this will allow growth of around 300mm with the early lag for up regulation and axonal transport delays from the cell body to the proximal neurorraphy site. The soleus, gastrocnemius and tibias posterior may partially reinnervate through the graft to the tibial nerve. The peroneus longus, brevis and tibias anterior could reinnervate from the common peroneal target grafts. Muscles beyond this are unlikely to regain any useful innervation. Trophic muscle stimulation physiotherapy can be used in such cases although the evidence is lacking. There is limited evidence that electrical stimulation creates stronger neurotrophism, faster and more sustained axonal regeneration. It cannot maintain motor activity in complete denervation lesson and is therefore less useful than in cases of spinal nerve root compression where there is some retained axonal activity in the affected root or perhaps other segmental innervation from adjacent roots that is unaffected. Whether is renders the muscle more responsive to incoming axons for longer remains to be proven.
Sensory recovery can be sustained with axonal growth for longer, perhaps even 2-3 years. If successful there is the potential for some protective sensation to the sole of the foot.

Outcome assessment should be using the Medical research Council (MRC) motor grading system (M0-M5). However it should be noted that grade 4 encompasses a huge percentage of potential outcome range with virtually non-functional to virtually normal and is therefore of limited value. Absolute strength with myometry may be better and can be compared to the normal contralateral limb, however it doesn’t measure endurance and fatigue which requires more extensive assessments that may be time prohibitive.
Sensory evaluation can be through the Sensory MRC scale using (S0, S1, S2 S3 S3+, S4)
Pain VAS scale 0-100 is a useful and simple tool for measuring pain, however formal recording of a McGill Pain score can be useful as well as monitoring analgesic and neuromodulator use.
Functional scores for the lower limb can be monitored but a patient specific goal-attainment score is useful for monitoring recovery and success following lower limb peripheral nerve reconstruction.
Psychological evaluation and some measure of wellbeing are useful in evaluating patients with complex diagnoses and long follow-up periods. The SF-36 is a reasonable score which measures a number of domains and yet is relatively simple and quick to complete.
References
Hoben GM, Ee X, Schellhardt L, Yan Y, Hunter DA, Moore AM, Snyder-Warwick AK, Stewart S, Mackinnon SE, Wood MD. Increasing Nerve Autograft Length Increases Senescence and Reduces Regeneration. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Oct;142(4):952-961
This study in rats demonstrates that there is lower regeneration in longer grafts. This is mirrored in clinical studies where long grafts have poor clinical outcomes in mixed motor and sensory nerve trunks.
George SC, Boyce DE. An evidence-based structured review to assess the resultsof common peroneal nerve repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Aug;134(2):302e-311e
This review of 1577 repairs of the common peroneal nerve demonstrated that later reconstruction of nerve gaps using autologous graft conferred lower rates of successful reinnervation and that larger gaps of 120mm or more had successful reinnervation of just 11% compared to 64% successful (>M4) in grafts less than 60mm.
Miloro M, Stoner JA. Subjective outcomes following sural nerve harvest. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Aug;63(8):1150-4
This study demonstrated satisfaction rates from sural nerve graft donor sites that correlated with recipient site successful reinnervation in maxillofacial surgery.
Hwang IK, Hahn SM, Kim HS, Kim SK, Kim HS, Shin KH, Suh CO, Lyu CJ, Han JW. Outcomes of Treatment for Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors: Different Clinical Features Associated with Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jul;49(3):717-726
95 patients treated for MPNDST. 52% 10 year survival. Survival for neurofibromatosis (NF) type 1 associated tumours was 45% and for sporadic tumours was 60%. The NF type 1 associated tumours were larger at presentation (82mm versus 50mm) and occurred in younger patients (mean 32 versus 45 years).
Stucky CC, Johnson KN, Gray RJ, Pockaj BA, Ocal IT, Rose PS, Wasif N. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST): the Mayo Clinic experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar;19(3):878-85. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1978-7
This is a review of 175 cases of MPNST over a 15 year period to 2010 treated at the Mayo clinic. 45% were extremity tumours. Local recurrence rate was 22% with 5 and 10 year disease specific survival at 60 and 45%. Tumours greater than 50mm in diameter, local recurrence and high grade were poor prognostic factors.
Reference
- orthoracle.com






















































