///

Lima SMR Reverse Total Shoulder Replacement for proximal humeral fracture

Learn the Lima SMR Reverse Total Shoulder Replacement for proximal humeral fracture surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Lima SMR Reverse Total Shoulder Replacement for proximal humeral fracture surgical procedure.
It is notoriously difficult to achieve a good functional outcome in older patients with displaced comminuted proximal humerus fractures managed surgically. In recent years shoulder surgeons have considered that this injury should be treated as a fracture with rotator cuff deficiency and hence have been using reverse geometry total shoulder replacements with a prosthetic ball on the glenoid (the glenosphere) and socket on the humeral side of a semi-constrained construct. This medialises the centre of rotation and increases the moment arm on which the large deltoid muscle can work in the absence of the rotator cuff tendons which normally insert around the proximal humerus. The main design remit for reverse shoulder arthroplasty was to address the difficult problem of arthritis in the rotator cuff deficient shoulder so called cuff tear arthropathy which presents as a chronic condition. Such implants have been in widespread use over the last 30 years gaining in popularity such that they have overtaken the number of anatomical shoulder replacements performed.
More recently the same implants have been used to treat comminuted displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. Traditionally such fractures have been associated with relatively poor outcomes when managed either conservatively or with internal fixation. The latter has been made significantly easier with contoured proximal humeral locking plates but still such surgery in osteoporotic bone is technically difficult and often associated with poor outcomes. A significant risk is avascular necrosis of the humeral head and resorption of the tuberosities with consequent rotator cuff dysfunction mimicking cuff tear arthropathy hence the adoption of reverse geometry arthroplasty.
An alternative would be to consider hemiarthroplasty reconstruction of the proximal humerus using a stemmed hemiarthroplasty prosthesis with reconstruction of the tuberosities around the implant. In such cases the significant problem is that the tuberosities resorb and the patient is left with a metal spacer and a rotator cuff deficient shoulder.
Implant companies have developed fracture specific reverse geometry implants which are tailored to the task. The Lima SMR is one of these as part of the spectrum of options available on their platform system. It uses the same glenosphere and humeral stem (cemented or uncemented) as their cuff tear arthropathy stemmed prosthesis but has a module trauma body added to the humeral stem which incorporates holes for passage of sutures to repair residual small fragments of bone and rotator cuff remnants.
Whilst there is some evidence in sporadic publications we are yet to have good hard level 1 evidence that reverse geometry arthroplasty in such cases is reliably and significantly better than either conservative management, internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty reconstruction, however there are trials ongoing to try and address the issue. Anecdotally most shoulder surgeons will have many examples of good outcomes from reverse geometry arthroplasty in such cases.


INDICATIONS
Comminuted displaced fractures of the proximal humerus involving the lesser and greater tuberosities. Typically an older age group would be considered for such surgery where the bone will be of poorer quality risking tuberosity resorption with either internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty reconstruction.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
Patients will usually present having had a fall from standing height injuring their shoulder. They will have pain and dysfunction. Clinical assessment will confirm swelling, bruising and tenderness. It is important to ascertain the neurological and vascular status of the upper limb. Assessment of distal perfusion is important and if there is any concern then angiography should be performed in close liaison with local vascular surgeons.
Neurological status of the upper limb particularly documenting the axillary nerve sensory function is important. Within the history taking pre-fracture shoulder function and status should be ascertained particularly whether the patient has had any previous surgical intervention. As with any patients considered for surgical management of acute fractures their past medical history and co-morbidities including medications should be taken into consideration.
IMAGING
Plain X-rays are mandatory and ideally these should be 3 views: AP, lateral and axillary or modified axial views. CT scanning, if logistically possible in the acutely injured patient, is also useful in pre-operative planning to assess the fracture fragments and looking for concurrent bony injury of the glenoid which may affect glenoid component fixation.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
Such fractures could be considered for internal fixation with plate and screws. Current practice would usually involve using a specific proximal humeral locking plate which is contoured to the proximal humerus anatomy. Techniques have been described for percutaneous wire fixation or even suture fixation of such fractures but these are technically challenging. Classically the approach in the older patient would have been to use a stemmed hemiarthroplasty implant reconstructing the tuberosities around the proximal aspect of the prosthesis.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
In a patient who is not suitable for surgical fixation then it is entirely reasonable to treat this fracture conservatively using a sling for comfort and prescribing oral analgesia. As the pain begins to settle then graduated physiotherapy rehabilitation can be adopted to try and optimise the function and in a significant proportion of patients this is acceptable to both patient and treating surgeon. Function is likely to be limited but often this is pain free.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
As with any patient treated surgically for acute fractures, their general medical health and co-morbidities must be taken in to consideration. Patients must be able to comply with relatively straight forward physiotherapy in the post-operative period and ongoing rehabilitation instruction to optimise their function

The procedure is performed under general anaesthetic usually supplemented with interscalene local anaesthetic nerve block performed by the anaesthetist. The patient is placed in the semi-sitting beach chair position with the arm on a moveable narrow arm board. It is often appropriate to perform a surgical wash of the affected shoulder and axilla prior to routine skin preparation. Unless there are contraindications I use Flowtron intermittent calf compression during surgery to reduce the risk of thromboembolic disease. Intravenous antibiotics are administered by the anaesthetist. The skin is prepared using Chlorohexidine solution starting with the hand and then preparing the whole of the upper limb and shoulder girdle across to the patient’s mid-line. Standard adhesive drapes are used to protect the patient’s airway tubing and to have adequate exposure for approach to the shoulder from an anterior deltopectoral incision. With the help of a company representative the nurses should be familiarised with the sets required for shoulder arthroplasty. I also use a standard set of shoulder retractors which significantly facilitate the operation.

AP radiograph indicating comminuted displaced fracture proximal humerus in lady in her 70s. Four main fragments can be seen: Humeral head (H); Greater tuberosity (G); Lesser tuberosity (L) and the disphyseal shaft (S). In addition to these main fragments making up the four part fracture there are numerous small bony fragments. Displacement & rotation of the humeral head fragment with loss of the medial calcar means that this fracture pattern is at high risk of avascular necrosis given the disruption of blood supply to the humeral head & tuberosities.

Lateral radiograph of the same proximal humeral fracture. Confirmation of 100% displacement of the humeral head fragment from the diaphysis. Although theorectically possible to fix this would be difficult and highly likely to fail.

Axillary plain X-ray of same shoulder. This view suggests no bony injury to the glenoid.

Patient positioned in the semi-sitting beach chair position with the arm resting on a moveable narrow arm board.

Waterproof draping to isolate the shoulder following preparation of the entire upper limb. The hand and forearm is covered with a cloth stockingette.

Large U-drape is then placed into the patient’s axilla.

Final adhesive drapes are placed across the top of the shoulder and to secure the stockingette in place. Quiver with diathermy and suction is placed in to the patient’s lap.

Palpate the coracoid process as the bony prominence just below the lateral clavicle (the circular skin marking). Skin incision is marked starting just lateral to the coracoid process extending distally in the line of the shaft of the humerus.

Skin incision through skin infiltrated with 20mls 0.5% Bupivacaine with Adrenaline. Cephalic vein is identified to indicate the deltopectoral interval. Usually the cephalic vein is mobilised laterally with the deltoid muscle which it drains.

Deeper dissection reveals the insertion of pectoralis major (PM) seen here running from left to right. The upper edge of the pectoralis major insertion can be released from the insertion onto the humeral shaft to facilitate access.

These narrow and broad curved forked glenoid retractors are useful in such arthroplasty surgery.

Kolbel’s self-retaining retractors are also used to facilitate access to the shoulder.

Further image of Kolbel’s retractors with solid removable blades which come in differing depths and are relatively atraumatic to the muscles.

Kolbel’s retractors (K) seen placed beneath conjoint tendon medially and deltoid muscle laterally. Broad glenoid retractor (G) has been placed on top of the coracoid process. Long head of biceps tendon is identified and in this case has been traumatically severed. The stump is being resected in this image.

Browne’s deltoid humeral head retractor is useful to place behind the humeral head beneath the deltoid. Radiolucent versions of this useful retractor are also available.

Second view of the dished end of the Browne’s retractor.

Move the diasphyseal shaft fragment anteriorly and palpate posteriorly to identify the humeral head fragment. Browne’s retractor has been placed beneath deltoid and behind the humeral head. Humeral head here seen to be markedly rotated and displaced.

By nature of the fracture pattern the humeral head has no attachments and is easily removed.

The bony fragment of the lesser tuberosity attached to the subscapularis tendon and muscle is identified anteriorly.

A core-type heavy suture (DepuyMitek Orthocord or Arthrex Fibrewire) is placed within the good tendon of subscapularis as a traction stay suture as shown here.

Using the traction stay suture the tendon and muscle of subscapularis can be mobilised and released of any adhesions.

Bony fragments of greater tuberosity attached to infraspinatus and supraspinatus are also identified posteriorly and superiorly by palpation. Image intensifier Xrays can be to confirm all bony fragments have been retrieved.

Again heavy suture can be used as a traction stay suture into good tendinous material around the bony fragments. Browne’s deltoid retractor is protecting the axillary nerve running around on the under surface of deltoid.

Forked glenoid retractor from the Lima SMR arthroplasty kit.

The diaphyseal shaft fragment is moved posteriorly again. Curved forked glenoid retractors are then placed posteriorly, inferiorly and superiorly around the glenoid to give good exposure. Palpate the axillary nerve running from anterior to posterior through the quadrilateral space just inferior to the glenoid and medial to the neck of the humerus. Protect the nerve and take care in placing the forked retractor under the inferior margin of the glenoid.

Sharp Cobb-like periosteal elevator which is used to scrape residual and often normal articular cartilage from the surface of the glenoid

Note sharp edge to periosteal elevator.

From the Lima SMR glenoid set select a glenoid sizing guide either small or standard. This also acts as a guide for the glenoid wire insertion.

In this case the small guide was selected and was a perfect fit. This is applied to the face of the glenoid to allow a central guidewire to be placed down the cannulated shaft.

This leaves the wire in position in the centre of the glenoid previously cleared of articular cartilage.

Select the appropriate size glenoid reamer of the two on the Lima set.

Second lateral image of the Small-R reamer marked S-R/S.

Reamer placed over the guidewire to further prepare the glenoid bony surface.

Prepare the glenoid down to just breach the subchondral bone.

Select the appropriate sized peg drill for the metal back glenoid, in this case the Small-R drill.

Drill hole for central peg is created over the guidewire.

Select the appropriate definitive metal back glenoid implant and mount on introducer.

Lateral view of metal back glenoid mounted on introducer.

Remove guidewire and position metal back glenoid into central peg hole. Palpate coracoid anterosuperiorly to glenoid face. Check glenoid implant rotation relative to coracoid process referencing preoperative imaging but aiming for anterosuperior corner of glenoid implant at the base of the coracoid. Impact into position using a mallet. Pushing the button on the introducer releases it’s attachment to the implant to allow retraction as shown. This enables a deep view to ensure that the metal back glenoid is seated onto the bone by assessing the position through the two drill holes and ensuring the implant has seated down against the prepared bone.

Remove the introducer and metal back glenoid is observed in its impacted position. The implant usually has excellent primary stability with the central peg impacted in position however fixation is secured with two cancellous screws into the holes which allow 20 degrees of angle variation. Drill superior drill hole aiming superior anterior into the base of the coracoid where there is usually a good bone (reference preoperative imaging). Inferior drill hole should be drilled with slight posterior direction. Depth gauge to measure the size of 6mm cancellous screw which are available in 5mm length increments (20-40mm)

Drill bit on flexible drill attachment

Drill guide available to facilitate initial drill entry into bone

Choose appropriate screw size and hold on screw holder and apply screwdriver.

Insert screws into drill holes in both superior and inferior holes of the metal back baseplate until securely fixed.

Select appropriate Lima reverse geometry shoulder replacement glenosphere implants. Available in three sizes 36mm is cobalt chrome. 40 (as shown here) and 44mm glenospheres are constructed in high molecular weight polyethylene. The four components required are the body of the glenosphere, the trunnion, the screw and the polyethylene button.

Insert the stem trunnion and impact with a single tap from a small mallet.

Insert introducer into the glenosphere as shown. Note the lip of polyethylene on one side of the glenosphere. This is intended to fit under the inferior aspect of the glenoid in an attempt to prevent notching of the inferior glenoid from abutment from the humeral cup.

The central peg fits in to the central hole of the metal back glenoid and with rotation the polyethylene glenosphere is orientated with the overhanging lip inferiorly. This is then impacted in position.

The screw is then placed into the central hole and screwed into position to give good fixation.

Mount the polyethylene button on the introducer.

Polyethylene button is then placed into the mouth of the screw hole and pushed into position.

Final position of the polyethylene button covering the screw.

Attention is turned to the humerus. Take the sharp intramedullary reamer and start with the smallest diameter one first.

Humeral shaft is then reamed primarily rotating the reamer by hand. This can be done sequentially and carefully to avoid diaphyseal fracture.

Then take sequential humeral shaft tamp reamers which double as the trial stems. Start with the smallest and increase in increments of 1mm.

The tamps are impacted into the shaft of the humerus without rotation for tight press fit for an uncemented prosthesis. With sequential impaction using a mallet onto the introducer the pitch sound changes and one feels a tight fit.

Take the collared height guide which is placed onto the inserter of the humeral shaft rasps to indicate correct implant height.

Once the size of diaphyseal stem has been chosen, the trial implant can be assembled and placed on the introducer using a version bar in the appropriate screw hole on the introducer at neutral or 20o retroversion. I tend to use 2o degrees retroversion for fracture reverses given the usual retroversion of the articular surface of a native humeral head. This is difficult to assess in the presence of an acute fracture so if there is concern about stability of the trial construct then try again with altered version.

Trial implant is impacted into the humeral shaft.

Version bar shown here at 20o retroversion.

Version bar in line with patient’s forearm to give adequate orientation and rotation.

Introducer is removed and the trial polyethylene cup insert is placed within the numeral body. Trial reduction can be undertaken under screening with image intensifier if required. If the shoulder is too tight firstly ensure any retractors are released or even removed. Ensure the tuberosities on their stay sutures are not in the way preventing reduction. If it appears the humeral component is too proud then it may need sinking further into the humeral shaft or consider taking a narrower stem. Further incremental resection of proximal humeral bone may also be considered. Stability and passive range of motion can be assessed at this stage. If stability is a concern because the shoulder feels too loose then use the larger trial cups or even consider the extension attachment. There is also an option for a lateralised cup liner.

Once stability with the trial implants has been ascertained open the definitive components. Assemble definitive implants onto introducer with the version bar.

Second view of assembled definitive implants.

Definitive implant is inserted into the humerus using the alignment rod along the line of the patient’s forearm.

Definitive implant is then impacted into position in the correct version.

Take the fixation screw.

Place the screw down the introducer and screw into position to definitively fix the body to the shaft when in position. Trial humeral inserts can then be used to optimise stability and passive range of motion.

Choose definitive metal humeral implant.

Place metal cup into the definitive implant and impact in position.

Traction stay sutures from lesser and greater tuberosities from subscapularis and infraspinatus tendons can then be passed through the holes on the fins of the definitive implant.

The prosthesis is then reduced to articulate with the polyethylene glenosphere. Traction stay sutures are then tied together to reduce the tuberosities around the proximal parts of the definitive implant in the reduced position. Bone nibbler can be used to harvest morsalised cancellous bone graft from the removed humeral head and packed in around the implant tuberosities and diaphyseal fragment.

Once the shoulder is reduced and the tuberosities are secured external rotation can be assessed.

Passive elevation can also be assessed in the final reduction.

Following washout with chlorhexidine solution and confirmation of haemostasis, continuous Vicryl suture is then used to repair superficial fascia and fat. Subcuticular Monocryl stitch is used to close the skin wound.

Adhesive paper Steristrips are then applied to cover the wound.

Simple adhesive dressing is applied over the wound.

Patient’s arm is then placed in a simple removable polysling.

Post-operative AP radiographs showing the position of implant. To the uninformed it can be difficult to interpret images of the Lima implant as the glenosphere is polyethylene and hence radiolucent compared to most companies metal glenospheres. This image confirms good position of glenoid screws and tight fit of the uncemented humeral stem.

Axillary X-ray of the post-operative position of the implant.

The patient’s arm is rested in a polysling for the first two weeks. During this time they can actively mobilise elbow wrist and hand and are encouraged to maintain underarm hygiene. They can start early active assisted elevation exercises below shoulder height and typically lying supine. Post-operative X-rays are taken in the first 24 hours following surgery and prior to discharge from hospital. Routine post-operative blood tests are taken and the patient is discharged home with the polysling and physiotherapy instruction when they are safe to do so typically in the first 48 hours following surgery. Outpatient physiotherapy rehabilitation is arranged to concentrate on graduated range of motion initially active assisted. Fracture clinic review is typically undertaken at two weeks for a wound check, removal of the paper Steristrips, trim ends of the absorbable sutures and further check radiographs. The sling can be weaned by four weeks and ongoing rehabilitation to optimise function is established with regular post-operative physiotherapy. The patient should be reviewed with repeat radiographs at six months, one year, two years and five years following surgery.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly. T Bufquin, A Hersan, L Hubert, P Massin. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2007;89-B:516-20
Functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. Boyle MJ, Youn SM, Frampton CM, Ball CM. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Jan;22(1):32-7
Comparison of Hemiarthroplasty and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures in Elderly Patients. Cuff DJ, Pupello DR. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Nov 20;95(22):2050-5
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. A blinded, randomized, controlled, prospective study. Sebastia-Forcada E, Cebrian-Gomez R, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Gil-Guillen V. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Oct;23(10):1419-26


Reference

  • orthoracle.com
Dark mode powered by Night Eye