
Learn the Median nerve neurolysis, resection and reconstruction using Axogen AVANCE processed nerve allograft surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Median nerve neurolysis, resection and reconstruction using Axogen AVANCE processed nerve allograft surgical procedure.
The median nerve is superficially placed at the wrist crease and is vunerable to injury. In this case there was a laceration to the median nerve that had occurred some 24 months previously. There was a delayed presentation and no surgical exposure was undertaken to explore the nerve at the time. The patient reported poor sensory recovery in the hand and constant neuropathic pain in the median nerve territory. There was a swelling within the nerve at the site of previous injury which was sensitive to local touch, eliciting severe neuropathic pain exacerbations with wrist extension and finger flexion. There was intact innervation to the thumb pulp and to the thenar muscles. A diagnosis of partial neuroma in continuity was made and the patient was considered for exploration, resection of the neuroma and reconstruction.
AVANCE (AxoGen Inc. Alachua, Florida, USA) processed nerve allograft was discussed as the patient was not willing to consider use of autologous graft with risk of further neuropathic pain at the donor site. The nerve was therefore reconstructed using an AVANCE allograft after meticulous intraneural dissection allowed preservation of the intact fascicles to the thumb.
In cases where there is some sensory preservation, consideration may be given to neurolysis and wrapping of a neuroma in continuity to diminish local mechanical irritation or nerve tether pain (neurostenalgia). Collagen nerve wraps and bio-resorbable polymer membranes can be used to diminish further post-operative scar tether at the level of the painful neuroma.
Autologous flaps, including the Becker adipo-fascial flap and the radial forearm perforator flap, can be used to provide additional cushioning of the sensitive area in such cases. This case demonstrated complete loss of function in the index and middle fingers and so the option of neurolysis was not considered.
The gold standard nerve graft option is a reversed sensory autologous nerve with the donor nerve selected based on the length of the defect, the number of cables required, the site of surgery and the type of anaesthesia. Autologous nerve graft harvest leaves a numb area of skin at another site and there can be donor proximal nerve stump neuroma formation. The option of autologous nerve graft may be unacceptable to some patients, particularly when they are presenting with significant neuropathic pain and the concern is that the donor nerve site could become another pain driver.
An alternative option is to use AVANCE processed nerve allograft. This is human nerve that is acellular having undergone detergent and enzyme washes. It is screened to avoid infection transmission and then provided sterile and frozen in a number of sizes. The graft is provided by AxoGen Inc Alacachua, Fl, USA.
Readers will also find the following associated techniques of interest:
Extended approach Carpal Tunnel decompression
Revision carpal tunnel decompression and application of Polyganics Vivosorb membrane
Combined median and ulnar nerve decompressions
Carpal tunnel decompression

INDICATIONS
The indications for nerve graft reconstruction are:
A primary nerve injury with traumatic nerve tissue loss
Delayed presentation with a gap after debridement of non-viable nerve tissue
A gap resulting from resection of a neuroma in continuity or after resection of a tumour.
In this case the decision to operate was based on the absence of sensation on some of the median nerve innervated digits. The presence of function within the motor fascicles of the median nerve and the thumb sensation were suggestive of injury to the superficial and ulnar fascicles of the median nerve.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
This patient had local swelling within the nerve with sensitivity to touch and an underlying intrusive neuropathic pain. There was absence of sensation in the index, middle and partial ring finger. The lack of sensation renders these digits prone to injury due to loss of protective sensation. There was a strong Tinel’s sign elicited on tapping at the site of injury and no distal Tinel’s sign. The combination of the proximal Tinel and an absent distal one are suggestive of a neuroma in continuity within the median nerve with effectively no sensory preservation too the effected digits. The presence of motor function in the thenar eminence and the preservation of thumb pulp sensation suggests that the fascicles to the thumb are not involved in the original injury. The original injury would have been a partial transection of the nerve. The dry skin in the digits is a feature of loss of small unmyelinated autonomic sudomotor function in the nerve. This is a feature of axonotmesis or neurotmesis injury.
IMAGING AND NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Ultrasound (US) can confirm the swelling within the median nerve, suggestive of a partial neuroma in continuity. High resolution US could demonstrate some fascicle continuity. US may be too painful to perform due to the contact sensitivity over the neuroma.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an alternative imaging modality that requires no probe contact on the sensitive area. I did not request imaging because the diagnosis is a clinical one that can be elicited with careful systematic clinical examination.
Neurophysiology studies may demonstrate the absence of sensory conduction to the index and middle fingers with decreased amplitude and slowing of conduction through the injured segment. Electromyography can be used to decide whether there has been any involvement of the motor innervation with reduced amplitude and polyphasic in cases where there has been some reinnervation.
Neurophysiology studies were not requested in this case because there was a clear clinical diagnosis and no sensory recovery or residual function in the index and middle fingers. Surgery was offered to try and resolve this situation and the patient accepted.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
In cases where there is some sensory preservation, consideration may be given to neurolysis and wrapping of a neuroma in continuity to diminish local mechanical irritation or nerve tether pain (neurostenalgia). Collagen nerve wraps and bio-resorbable polymer membranes can be used to diminish further post-operative scar tether at the level of the painful neuroma.
Autologous flaps, including the Becker adipo-fascial flap and the radial forearm perforator flap, can be used to provide additional cushioning of the sensitive area in such cases. This case demonstrated complete loss of function in the index and middle fingers and so the option of neurolysis was not considered.
The gold standard nerve graft option is a reversed sensory autologous nerve with the donor nerve selected based on the length of the defect, the number of cables required, the site of surgery and the type of anaesthesia. Autologous nerve graft harvest leaves a numb area of skin at another site and there can be donor proximal nerve stump neuroma formation. The option of autologous nerve graft may be unacceptable to some patients, particularly when they are presenting with significant neuropathic pain and the concern is that the donor nerve site could become another pain driver.
An alternative option is to use AVANCE processed nerve allograft. This is human nerve that is acellular having undergone detergent and enzyme washes. It is screened to avoid infection transmission and then provided sterile and frozen in a number of sizes. The graft is provided by AxoGen Inc Alacachua, Fl, USA.
AVANCE processed nerve allograft can be used in diameters up to 4-5mm and 70mm in length. There is the option to reconstruct a nerve with cabled allograft using smaller diameter allografts in the sam way that autologous cable nerve grafting is performed. The graft may be sutured in place or secured collagen nerve wraps or nerve connectors plus a fibrin glue (Tisseel).
When a nerve is deemed non-reconstructable (poor bed for grafting, long defect) a distal sensory nerve transfer can be used to provide some protective sensation to the anaesthetic area. The 4th webspace nerve can be used to transfer to the radial digital nerve (RDN) of the index to allow axons from the ulnar nerve to repopulate the empty endoneural tubes in the index RDN and provide protective sensation. This technique bypasses the area of the original injury.
In cases where there is a complete loss of median nerve function and the primary nerve defect is deemed non-reconstructable, motor nerve transfer from the abductor digit minim to the motor branch of the median nerve combined with either superficial radial nerve terminal branches to the dorsal of them and index sensory transfer to the ulnar digital nerve (UDN) of the thumb and the RDN index or 4th webspace to first webspace ulnar to median nerve transfer in the palm. The restoration of protective sensation to the key contact zones (UDN thumb and RDN index) is the aim of the sensory transfer in this latter situation, rather than restoration of function to the whole median nerve territory.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
The neuroma in continuity can be treated with neuromodulation to try and reduce the severity off symptoms.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Contraindications to graft reconstruction are active infection and poor surgical bed with scar. The AVANCE allograft is a useful alternative to autologous nerve graft when a patient refuses autologous graft harvest. The patient must consent to use of allograft in this situation. AVANCE allograft has excellent safety data and excellent efficacy data in digital nerve reconstruction. Reconstruction of non-digital sensory nerves has reasonable efficacy data. There is no good comparative data for AVANCE allograft versus autologous sensory graft in mixed nerve reconstruction. The patient must be aware of the limited evidence base to date. The limitation is due to the relative numbers of nerve injuries and the comparative trials published only in digital nerve reconstruction at the time of writing in 2019.

For cases of median nerve exploration and AVANCE nerve allograft reconstruction, I use brachial plexus regional block anaesthesia. The surgery is performed on a single limb and there is no requirement for lower limb autologous nerve graft harvest. The block is preformed under ultrasound guidance with a combination of local anaesthetic agents to provide a rapid onset and sustained anaesthesia that provides an extended post-operative block for between 8 and 12 hours. When the block is performed at the level of the upper arm a supplementary subfascial block is required to anaesthetise the skin supplied by the intercostobrachial nerve and the medial cutaneous nerve of the arm. The addition of this block ensures that a pneumatic tourniquet can be placed around the upper arm without discomfort should if be required for up to 120 minutes.
Antibiotics are administered intravenously to cover common skin commensals in advance of the tourniquet insufflation. The antibiotics are used due to the planned implantation of a nerve allograft which will take a few days to vascularise form the bed and the proximal and distal nerve stumps.
The regional block allows exploration of the site of the median nerve neuroma with a bloodless field. Additionally, the duration of the block ensures that there is sufficient time for a complete neurolysis of the median nerve, resection of the neuroma and reconstruction. Intra-operative nerve stimulation is still possible due to the segmental nature of the conduction block achieved at the level of the local anaesthetic infiltration at the upper arm. The stimulation can be used to map intact function in the fascicles to the thenar muscles. These are functioning at the start of the procedure and the aim is to preserve them and resect the neuroma in the remaining fascicles to the index, middle and ring fingers.
The hand is exsanguinated and the tourniquet elevated. The skin is prepared with chlorhexidine.
The arm is draped and the positioned on a side arm table in a supinated position with the and secured in a ”lead” hand.
The site of planned skin incision is marked. The exposure for the safe exposure of the nerve through the previous scarred bed requires an extensile incision and full release of the carpal tunnel t identify the motor branch of the median nerve and trace the fascicle group back into the main nerve.
A “V” extension is made across the volar wrist crease to expose the median nerve deep to the ante brachial fascia in the distal forearm.

The operation WHO “sign-out”is completed and the surgical team will complete the operation record, the post-operative prescriptions and the discharge summary. The rehabilitation plan is put in place and the patient is informed about the procedure and the expected recovery going forwards.
The limb is placed in a Bradford sling for elevation and protection whilst under persisting regional block anaesthesia.
The patient can be discharge the same day with plans for dressing reduction and wound inspection at 7-10 days post-operatively.
The wrist can be moved at that stage and the patient is encouraged to mobilise the digits.
Neuromodulator medications may help in the management of neuropathic pain in the post-operative period.
During the recovery phase there is no protective sensation in the radial digits and the patient must be taught to keep the skin soft and supple using emollient creams. There is a risk of thermal injury and trophic ulceration.
The joints in the thumb should be kept mobile and the use of a thermoplastic splint to hold the thumb in a mid-palmer abduction and mid-opposition position may encourage functional use of the hand.
The Tinel’s sign progression can be used to evaluate axon regeneration rate. A create of 1mm per day is expected after a graft reconstruction with a lag of 2 weeks. In nerve allograft it is my experience that the lag is longer at perhaps 4 weeks and the rate of regeneration is slower than for autograft, perhaps because of the need for more cellular migration to the allograft than for autologous graft.
The quality of the regeneration can be assessed with the differential Tinel’s sign. Stronger tingling at the distal regenerating nerve front than at the proximal reconstruction site implies a good quality repair whilst inverse with stronger proximally may imply axon hold-up at the co-aptation site and could represent a poorer quality repair with scar formation.
Early signs of nerve recovery are the restoration of autonomic vasomotor and sudomotor function in the hand in the territory of the median nerve. thee fibres are small and unmyelinated. They grow more rapidly than the larger sensory fibres that require mature myelin sheaths for normal function. as such the restoration of the autonomic fibres is a precursor of sensory recovery. Sensory recovery can be evaluated with the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament p[ressure threshld testing and the static and moving 2-point discrimination tests.
Normal monofilament thresholds are 0.04 – 0.2g. Normal S2PD is 5mm and M2PD 3mm in a young adult.
Motor functional recovery is usually measured using the Medical Research Council (MRC) grading system:
MRC 0 = no function
MRC 1 = flicker of contraction
MRC 2 = function with gravity eliminated
MRC 3 – anti-gravity function
MRC 4 = function against gravity and resistance
MRC 5 = normal power
The first sign of reinnervation of a muscle is tenderness on muscle squeeze testing. Muscle bulk will take many months to recover and the ultimate strength will be lower than for an uninjured limb and there will be early fatigue with limited endurance.
Failed reconstruction can be salvaged with revision grafting or distal nerve transfer. For sensory nerve restoration transfer of the superficial radial nerve dorsal branches can be transferred to the first webspace digital nerves (UDN thumb and RDN index). The 4th webspace nerve can also be transferred to the first webspace as an alternative strategy.
There us a motor reconstruction that can be used to salvage the thenar function. The ADQ branch of the ulnar nerve deep motor branch can be transferred to the motor branch without a graft. There are other potential motor nerve donors including the EIP and EPB innervation from the posterior interosseous nerve.

The results of nerve graft reconstruction are variable. There are many factors influencing the outcome including the size of the nerve gap, the severity of the injury, adequacy of the debridement, the surgical bed, the time since injury, the type of nerve, the type of graft used and the distance from the nerve injury site to the targets.
Mixed nerves perform wore than pure motor and in turn pure sensory nerves. The use of autologous nerve graft is the current gold standard treatment with processed nerve allograft performing comparably in sensory gaps up to 50mm. For mixed nerves, the evidence for allograft is less clear. For gaps that are longer than 50mm there appears to be a clear advantage in autologous sensory nerve grafts.
Allograft has the advantage that it is not limited by host availability and there are no donor site complications.
Allograft is expensive and not readily available in all territories, or within all healthcare facilities.
The anticipated outcome from mixed nerve graft of 50mm is approximately 40% of patients will have a meaningful recovery of MRC grade 3 or greater motor function and Sensory MRC grade 3+ (enhanced level of sensory function) and 50-60% will have Sensory MRC grade 3 or above.
Sensory recovery is measured using Semmes-`Weinstein monofilament pressurethrechold detection. Normal young adult perception is between 0.04g and 0.2g. Diminished sensation at 2g is an excellent outcome from nerve repair with some reaching 4g (protective sensation).
Two point discrimination is used as a measure of sensory recovery, however therein a learning element and as such it is not as valid a measure os monofilaments. The 2PD can be measured as static or moving. Normal static 2PD (S2PD) in the thumb is approximately 5mm and moving 2PD (M2PD) is approximately 3mm.
The results of Avance processed nerve allograft have been reviewed by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in the UK. Interventional Procedure Guidance (IPG 587) was released in 2017 and has reviewed all contemporaneous publications from the industry funder RANGER database as well as the outcome data prom independent centres and includes the results of RCTs in digital nerve reconstruction. To date there are no RCTs in Avance processed nerve allograft outcomes in mixed nerve reconstruction
References:
References:
Rinker et al. Use of Processed Nerve Allografts to Repair Nerve Injuries Greater Than 25 mm in the Hand.Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Jun;78(6S Suppl 5):S292-S295
The RANGER database is an industry registry of outcomes for Avance processed nerve allograft use in nerve gap reconstruction. A subset analysis for digital nerve injury with gaps of 25mm or greater demonstrated recovery to S3 level in 86% of repairs which compares favourably to historical data using autologous nerve graft (60-88%).The study to date demonstrated excellent safety data and an advantage of nerve allograft is the absence of potential donor site problems.
Reference
- orthoracle.com






















































