
Learn the Shoulder Fusion surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Shoulder Fusion surgical procedure.
Effective prevention of the causes of paralytic flail shoulder and the introduction of reliable arthroplasty options have led to markedly decreased indications for glenohumeral arthrodesis. However, arthrodesis still remains a valuable and important method of shoulder management particularly in the salvage situation. Glenohumeral arthrodesis provides the stability required for distal elbow and hand function. It is important that patients retain scapulothoracic motion and adequate scapular control is a pre-requisite for surgery. The main indications are currently: Flail shoulder, post tumour resection, infection and salvage following failed shoulder replacement or failed treatment of instability.

Paralytic poliomyelitis is the commonest historical cause of paralytic flail shoulder. The implementation of a worldwide programme of vaccination against poliovirus, has virtually irradiated the condition in developed countries and in modern times, traumatic brachial plexus injuries have become the commonest cause of flail shoulder. Pan-root avulsions remains an unfortunate but relatively common injury pattern associated with motorcycle accidents. This catastrophic injury renders the entire limb flail and in such cases, nerve reconstruction techniques for restoration of shoulder function remain severely limited due to the lack of available donor nerves. In patients with partial plexus injuries involving the upper roots, shoulder function and stability will be lost. With preserved function in the lower plexus roots, nerve transfer options are available and generally reliable in restoring shoulder function in such patients if undertaken early enough. Flail shoulder is still seen in neglected cases or cases where nerve reconstruction has failed and in such cases fusion may be indicated.
Patients with flail shoulders develop inferior subluxation of the humeral head and this can cause, sometimes severe, aching due to the unsupported weight of the arm. This promotes reliance on slings which hampers potential hand and elbow function and can cause secondary issues with negative postural effects and muscular imbalance. For patients with flail shoulders who have elbow and hand function, shoulder stability becomes a priority as it allows them to position and use the hand in space.
Total shoulder replacement has established itself as the gold standard treatment of symptomatic glenohumeral arthritis. Arthritis can occur as a result of primary osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthropathy, post trauma, post infective, secondary to rotator cuff tears and instability. Arthrodesis is now generally reserved for salvage following failed arthroplasty rather than a primary treatment for arthritis. There is still a role for arthrodesis following tumour excision and following osteomyelitis/septic arthritis.
A prerequisite for glenohumeral arthrodesis is retained scapulothoracic movement. If there is good scapular control (i.e. trapezius, rhomboid, elevator scapulae and serratus anterior functioning), then arthrodesis allows adequate stabilization for effective hand function. If these muscles are absent of significantly weakened, function following fusion will be grossly diminished. Additionally, without sufficient scapular motion the arm position becomes too rigid and fixed, and this can become more of an impediment with the patient feeling the arm is permanently in the way.
Controversy still surrounds the optimal position for fusion. The shoulder should be arthrodesed with enough abduction to clear the axilla, enough internal rotation to reach the midline of the body and enough forward flexion so that the hand can reach the face and head. Conversely, abduction, forward flexion and rotation should not be excessive. The arm should be able to achieve a ‘natural’ position at the patients side without scapula winging, patients should be able to reach a trouser pocket with their hand. Importantly, the patient should be able to sleep comfortably on the side of the arthrodised shoulder. The optimal position for arthrodesis is bespoke to each patient. Modifications based on patient size, body habitus and objectives of fusion are all taken into account. As a general guide the fusion position is 20 degrees of abduction, 20 degrees of forward flexion , and 40 degrees of internal rotation.

The procedure is performed under general anaesthetic. The patient is placed in a lateral position with the affected side uppermost. Pelvic supports and bolsters are positioned to ensure that the trunk alignment is square to the operating table/floor. The operated arm is placed in a multi-directionally adjustable gutter and this allows positioning of the arm in respect to the trunk. The gutter is set so that abduction, forward flexion and internal rotation of the arm are in the desired arthrodesis position. Typical the shoulder should be positioned so that elbow flexion allows the hand to be brought to the mouth and that there is sufficient abduction for axillary hygiene. Prophylactic antibiotics are given at induction of anaesthesia.

Shoulder immobilisation is achieved with a polysling and external rotation wedge. Off-the-shelf orthotic wedges are usually used to achieve immobilisation in external rotation, but by adjusting the placement of the wedge on the trunk in a more anterior position, the desired degree of internal rotation is achieved. Scapulothoracic and elbow motion is encouraged as soon as pain allows.
The plate and screw construct achieves rigid fixation, as a consequence there is frequently little callus formation. Sling and wedge immobilisation is continued continuously for 8 weeks and then at night and in crowds for a further 4 weeks.

Patient satisfaction after shoulder arthrodesis is reported at around 80% (Clare et al).
Complications include non-union, humeral fracture and malpositioning. Published rates of nonunion vary according to indications for surgery. It is rare to see a non-union when the indication for fusion has been a brachial plexus lesion. Usually in this situation the bone and joint architecture is normal. In the presence of infection and bone loss, the non-union rates increase accordingly. In Cofield and Briggs’ series of 71 arthrodeses, only 3 resulted in nonunion. These three were successfully fused following a second operative procedure.
Cofield and Briggs also reported humeral fracture in 10 of their 71 patients. The highest risk appears to be fracture distal to the implant. It is not known whether prophylactic removal of the internal fixation plate can reduce this incidence of fracture.
Patient satisfaction after shoulder arthrodesis is reported at around 80% (Clare et al).
Complications include non-union, humeral fracture and malpositioning. Published rates of nonunion vary according to indications for surgery. It is rare to see a non-union when the indication for fusion has been a brachial plexus lesion. Usually in this situation the bone and joint architecture is normal. In the presence of infection and bone loss, the non-union rates increase accordingly. In Cofield and Briggs’ series of 71 arthrodeses, only 3 resulted in nonunion. These three were successfully fused following a second operative procedure.
Cofield and Briggs also reported humeral fracture in 10 of their 71 patients. The highest risk appears to be fracture distal to the implant. It is not known whether prophylactic removal of the internal fixation plate can reduce this incidence of fracture.
The most critical complication that may occur is malpositioning of the extremity. Clare et al emphasise that this is primarily the result of excessive abduction and flexion. This has a tendency to produce malrotation or winging of the scapula, which results in a dull, painful ache in the shoulder.
Cofield RH, Briggs BT. Glenohumeral arthrodesis. Operative and long-term functional results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61:668-77
Clare, D.J., Wirth, M.A., Groh, G.I. and Rockwood Jr, C.A., 2001. Shoulder arthrodesis. JBJS, 83(4), p.593-600
Reference
- orthoracle.com



















