
Learn the Supinator to Posterior Interosseous Nerve Transfer (S-PIN transfer) surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Supinator to Posterior Interosseous Nerve Transfer (S-PIN transfer) surgical procedure.
Motor nerve transfer surgery uses an expendable nerve branch or redundant nerve fascicle from within a functioning nerve to transfer directly to the terminal motor branch of a paralysed muscle with a more important function. The nerve co-aptation is close to the target muscle and reinnervation distances are therefore short. The Supinator to Posterior Interosseus nerve transfer (S-PIN transfer) is indicated in isolated lower brachial plexus injuries (C8/T1), degenerate C8 motor radiculopathy or in mid-cervical tetraplegia. The aim is to restore digit extension using medial and lateral branches of the PIN to supinator innervated from the C6 root. These branches are implanted to the adjacent PIN (C8 digit extension) through either an anterior or a posterior approach to the PIN. The supinator is decompressed as part of the procedure when performed through the anterior approach and this technique is illustrated here.

INDICATIONS
The supinator branches of the PIN arise separate from the main PIN and supply supinator just beyond its proximal edge. Two branches each 1.5-2cm long can usually be identified – one for each head. Supinator is mainly C6 root innervation. The PIN supplies digit extension with C8.
The SPIN transfer is indicated as part of a C8,T1 avulsion for restoration of digit extension. It may also be used in a motor radiculopathy or C8 or in mid-cervical tetraplegia for restoration of finger and thumb extension. This transfer is only for root level pathology without injury to the posterior cord or radial nerve.
Typically this would be used for tetraplegia patients at ICHT grade 2-4 to assist active digit extension. The biceps is also a supinator and should be working normally and not planned for transfer (sometimes biceps to triceps tendon transfer is preferred in a spastic flexed elbow to the typical deltoid to triceps tendon transfer or the theres minor to long head of triceps nerve transfer for restoration of elbow extension in triceps minus ICHT cases).
This transfer must be completed in the first 9 months from injury if the extensors demonstrate lower motor neurone denervation on EDC and EPL electromyographic testing. If there is no denervation (UMN lesion) then the transfer can be completed years after the spinal cord injury as long as the hand joints are flexible.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
The patient will have an intact posterior cord and radial nerve but absent C8 contribution to this nerve. In such cases there is good contraction of the supinator with the elbow extended as well as functional supination with the elbow flexed through the biceps tendon insertion to the proximal radius. The strength of supinator should be assessed and the procedure should not be contemplated unless there is MRC grade 5 power of supination. The function of EDC, EDM, ECU, EIP, APL, EPB and EPL will typically be absent. In a C8 motor radiculopathy there may be some sparing of EIP or EPL and the transfer will need to target fascicles of the PIN other than those already functioning. In such instances there is a risk of temporarily losing some of this function and so proceed with caution.
IMAGING
Imaging is not necessary. MRI of the cervical spine and brachial plexus may confirm C8 and T1 root avulsions of degenerative compression of the C8 nerve root.
Neurophysiology studies can confirm denervation of the potential target muscles with fibrillation potentials on electromyography (EMG)>
In the tetraplegic upper limb the EMG is more challenging to interpret. Patients may have denervation changes due to anterior horn cell damage and subsequent Wallerian degeneration (ie a lower motor neurone lesion of C7 and C8 innervated muscles, however there is often sparing of the anterior horn cells below the level of the cord contusion in a narrow cervical spinal cord zone of injury. In such cases there may be no volitional motor activity but some of the axons arising from C8 may be preserved without complete Wallerian degeneration. In such cases the procedure could successfully target non-functioning but non-denervated (upper motor neurone lesion) muscle well beyond the typical 6-12 months period for successful reinnervation of a LMN lesion using nerve transfer. There may be sampling error on EMG and whilst pre-operative EMG is useful in planning it cannot replace the intra-operative stimulation necessary after surgical exploration of the recipient nerve.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
Tendon transfers may be considered for restoration of finger and thumb extension if there is a reliable donor muscle. Typically in a C8.T1 root avulsion there is no finger flexion and only weak wrist flexion and so tendon transfer options are limited. The brachialis muscle may be transferred for finger flexion and the FCR if sufficiently strong can be transferred to combined finger and thumb extension.
In a tetraplegic patient, modification of the tenodesis response can be achieved by the House procedure and the Elk procedures in a midcervical tetraplegia. The brachioradialis can be transferred for finger flexion or key pinch through FPL and the wrist extensors act to create tenodesis of the digits. A tendon loop from extensor to extensor in adjacent digits passing deep to the extensor mechanism improves passive digit extension in wrist flexion and allows digit roll-up when the wrist extensor is activated. This rebalances the index particularly allowing the thumb to target the side of the PIPJ for key grip which is active, being powered through the brachioradialis to FPL tendon transfer. The FPL flexion postion is improved by partialFPLto extensor transfer and EPL reefing.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
There are no good options for digit extension other than using a glove splint with either elastic extension recoil strips or an out-rigger passive extension assist splint. These are cumbersome and not well-tolerated by patients. Both devices require active digit flexion and are therefore not useful in a C8,T1 root avulsion.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Non-functioning supinator or weak biceps supination are contra-indications to the S-PIN transfer.

The patient can have a regional anaesthetic block at the supraclavicular level or a high axillary nerve block. No peripheral nerve top ups should be allowed in the vicinity of the radial nerve at the lateral arm. An alternative is to use general anaesthesia without neuromuscular blockade.
The patient is positioned supine with the arm extended on an arm table. A tourniquet is essential because of the rich vascular networks around the elbow and in the proximal forearm. should be applied to the upper arm but not elevated until the limb is prepped and draped. This minimised the nerve ischaemic time allowing exposure of the PIN and the supinator branches without loss of conduction. Use an Esmarch bandage to exsanguinate the limb after limb preparation and draping. The hand should be positioned in supination using a lead hand.
A nerve stimulator is required and a circuit with patient electrode. Ideally the stimulator should be a variable stimulation device with a frequency of 2Hertz. A stimulator needle is used with and arthroscopy camera drape over the needle connections so that a member of the non-scrubbed theatre team can control the stimulator and adjust stimulation as instructed by the lead surgeon.
Micro surgical instruments are required including fine jewellers forceps and curved serrated nerve microscissors.
Nerve suture is with 9’0 nylon on a microneedle and the co-aptation is reinforced with Tisseel (Baxter) fibrin glue.

This procedure may be performed in combination with the brachial to anterior interosseous nerve (BrAIN) transfer for restoration of digital flexion and extension in an isolated complete C8,T1 root avulsion injury. The BrAIN procedure will be featured elsewhere in OrthOracle.
A waterproof dressing with absorbent pad is applied to the wound. The wound should be kept clean and dry for 5 days after which the patient can shower then replace the dressing. A polysling is applied to the upper limb with a torso strap around the waist before the patient wakes from surgery. The polysling and torso strap should be maintained for 3 weeks to prevent excessive passive movement at the elbow
During this phase the patient is encouraged to maintain isometric contraction of the donor muscle (supinator) in the sling and to visualise the combination of tsupination and digit extension action.
Nerve transfer rehabilitation involves a 6-phase programme of activity developed at the Centre for Nerve Injury and Paralysis, Birmingham, UK.
Phase 1 – Pre-operative phase: Education and donor optimisation. Introduction to trophic stimulation and the concept for functional electrical stimulation (FES).
Phase 2 – Protection phase: During the immediate post-operative period the nerve transfer is protected from inadvertent injury with the arm immobilised. Isometric contraction of the donor and visualisation of the combination donor-recipient action is performed during this period which typically lasts 3 weeks.
Phase 3 – Prevention phase: During this phase the arm is mobilised and neural gliding is commenced. Joint range of motion exercises (active and passive) are commenced to prevent joint contractures developing. The isometric exercises are continued and isotonic and eccentric exercises are commenced for the donor muscle to maintain function and restore strength. Functional stimulation can be commenced on the donor muscle. Trophic stimulation can be maintained on the recipient muscle.
Phase 4 – Power phase: During this period the donor muscle is strengthened and the recipient muscle starts to respond. Typically the first sign of reinnervation is a tender muscle squeeze sign due to small fibre reinnervation. Typically this is 3 months following transfer but is affected by the distance of the co-aptation from the recipient motor point.Visible flickers of contraction follow within 6 weeks and donor activation potentiate the recipient response. FES continues and the phase lasts for approximately 6-12 months during which useful motor grade returns: Medical Research Council – (MRC) Grade 3-4.
Phase 5 – Plasticity: During this phase the patient works on activation of the recipient muscle without activation of the donor. This phase can overlap with phase 4 and is guided by a therapist specialised in nerve transfer rehabilitation.
Phase 6 – Purpose: During this phase the patient introduces function tasks discussed as objectives during the pre-operative phase. This period of training is tailored to the individual and includes work hardening. Improvements are typically found in power and functional performance for at least 2 years following nerve transfer surgery.

Outcomes assessment can be with MRC scales but because of the huge functional variation within MRC Grade 4, I prefer absolute muscle testing with digital myometry and comparison with the contralateral limb. In addition fatigue testing and functional scores are important. The EQ5D, DASH and the BrAT scores are in common use in assessing upper limb function after brachial plexus injury. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is an ideally suited tool to assess patient specific objectives and outcomes.
Author’s note:
This transfer is technically demanding and the decision making is complex. In this case there was partial preservation of PIN with intact EPL function and this fascicle group was preserved. In a complete C8,T1 root avulsion the PIN will have a LMN lesion and transfer will be to the whole PIN. In a tetraplegic UMN lesion the PIN will stimulate but careful pre-operative evaluation will have demonstrated no intact volitional function in the PIN and the procedure would be completed with transfer to the whole PIN.
References:
Nerve transfers for the restoration of function after spinal cord injury. Mackinnon S, Yee A, Ray W. J Neurosurg.2012; 117: 176-185
Nerve transfers to retore upper extremity function in cervical spinal cord injury: Update and preliminary outcomes. Fox I et al. PRS. 2015; 4: 780-792
Reference
- orthoracle.com























































